In today’s Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/home-page there is a superb article by Nick Timiraos titled, “Mortgage-Assistance Program Offers Disparate Treatment Depending on Goals and Circumstances”.

With respect to the full article, I am excerpting a small section of it because it details important components of the program. Mr. Timiraos writes:
….
The program has two main components. One provision will allow diligent borrowers who are current on their mortgage payments but have little or no equity in their homes to refinance their first mortgage to take advantage of current interest rates, which have fallen to near record lows. That is designed to allow responsible borrowers -- mainly those who have been hurt by falling home prices -- to benefit from the current climate. Lenders won't refinance borrowers who don't have equity in their homes.

The second component involves modifying mortgage loans to lower monthly payments to 31% of the borrowers' gross monthly income, mainly by reducing the interest rate on the loan. This effort would target borrowers who are falling behind on their mortgage payments or who are in danger of falling behind. The government will provide financial incentives to lenders and mortgage servicing companies to encourage them to offer the reduced payment plans, which last for five years.

But as with any broad effort, homeowners are treated unevenly in the programs. The refinance provision is open only to borrowers who have loans that are owned by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. That excludes large numbers of borrowers with subprime and other exotic mortgages sold to investors; and borrowers with so-called "jumbo" loans that are too large for government backing. Those groups will be eligible for the modification part of the plan, but only for loans up to $729,750.

Borrowers who owe more than 105% of the current value of their home also won't be eligible for refinancing. That means that fewer borrowers in the nation's most over-heated housing markets, including California and Florida, and in some of the most depressed market in the Midwest can take advantage of the program. "Most of the people we serve are too far underwater to take advantage of this," says Dan Elsea, a mortgage broker in Detroit.

Nationally, 25% of mortgage holders have conforming loans that are within the 80% to 105% loan-to-value ratio needed to qualify for the program, according to real estate Web site Zillow.com. But that number falls in certain high-cost housing markets that have seen big price declines. In Los Angeles, for example, just 9% of mortgage holders are eligible to refinance, while 8% of conforming borrowers are too far underwater, according to Zillow.com.
….

Thanksgiving

It seems with all that is happening in our real estate market - there is still much to be thankful for and that includes right now the ability to even complain about it.

Can I just start charging people $1.00 every time I'm asked - "How's the market?" I think it would help offset my bus fare. My favorite response has always been - "which market are you asking about?" Because we certainly have a commercial; residential; rental; sales; uptown; downtown; midtown; etc. set of markets all of which have been performing differently at different times. But we can be really safe saying now -- every one of these markets is essentially just WAITING. But -- the big one here -- if people felt edged out over the past year by prices, please start looking because there are possibilities out there now. For instance, co-op studios have dropped under 300K - and there is more to follow. Of course, many properties were just simply over-priced to begin with but there's no question that prices have dropped from 2007 - to the tune of 30%.

Traditionally everyone waits about 60 days after a Presidential election (Yea Obama!) to make any major decision, and this year is no different.

I'm longing for January 2009.

I loved receiving from Rick Gregory, my main man at Weichert Financial, the first news of the drop in rates today - followed up by his remarks that he will do whatever it takes to get the deal done for us. Now that's a CAN DO type of attitude I love. He's also a rarity in this business.

What is it about most Manhattanites that everyone has to be so cranky, all of the time? Is it because no matter how much money you make, it's never enough? No matter how many sit-ups you do, it's never enough? No matter how many friends you make - or for that matter, enemies, it's never enough? And on that note - it seems I have no end of either friends or enemies. I've been told it's because I speak my opinion -- classic Sagittarius trait I reckon. But for better and often for worse, I have unfortunately spoken my opinion.

So leading with "crankiness" -- we are smack up against Thanksgiving - a time of reflection, draggin' out the old speeches that other people wrote and said. And I'm feeling a wee bit cranky myself.